« January 2007 | Main | May 2007 »

April 24, 2007

301.83

Q
once again I am facing what might be the core question of humanity: what do you do when you know that what you have right now is going to go away?
[lets face it] we're all going to die, but somehow must accept that we're alive right now.

what do you do when something you love stands before you. something that
has gone away before.
has left you beofre.
has forgotten there was anything other
has cussed you out, chased you out
shut you out, chased anything else
not noticed
never known
disolved?

Do you open wide and swallow it whole while it still seems to hold space? Or, do you hold back and protect your future heart from its invevitable pain?

Do you let yourself say feel the okay-ness and say "forever" in as much as it is the only thing big enough to fill this moment? or do you say, "nothing is true forever", meaning...probably its not even true for you right now.

how much do you let yourself believe?


A

taste it, Andy. its delicious.
run hard in the beautiful sun. chase it past the horizon.
again and again your heart breaks open.

"Everything in and about ourlives runs off the fuel of our hearts. We will all have experiences meant to 'break our hearts'--not in half but wide open. Regardless of how your heart is broken, your choice is always the same: What will you do with your pain? Will you use it as an excuse to give fear more authority over you, or can you release the authority of the physical world over you through an act of forgiveness? The question contained within the fourth chakra will be presented to you again and again in your life untill the answer you give becomes your own liberation."
--Carolyn Myss

I want to know what it is to feel loved.
I want my skin to be soft.
I want to feel young before I get too old.

April 19, 2007

re-edify

I started by working on the space next door. covering the windows and seeing the books that angela has started to move over there. movement and spirituality sort books. She decided that the suicide girls could stay over here with the rifle. I looked at my books, the division of what goes where is not so simple. in the spectrum of body, movement, feminism, gay studies, and sex it is hard to draw the line. what is this division? and then, there are the books about death.

I almost took the roses over there. Last night, helen cut me roses in the twilight and wind. the pink ones almost glowed purple and the red ones an engulfing black. drunk off the red one. the ancient symbols of nothing by no other name and anything by everything always. Almost drunk enough. and in the yellow one, there was a deep remembering.

I did a massage that used to be extreme erotic transference (ie. slimy!). but I did a phone session before scheduling again, directly discussing things. and then---what was before lude comment put on me. so clearly manifested in the body. four left side injuries. the feet. he came wearing two different shoes: a ratty old sneaker on the left foot, a new one on the right. we talked about the stickiness of scar tissue. that basically everything we were working on was old stuff...the new stuff just stuck to it, but itself wasnt yet manifest.

anything we feel, we only feel because it is in us somewhere already. in polarity: if you feel sick, it is because you are sick. nobody gets anything on us that we dont already have. and maybe we meet it again so we can deal with it. Its hard for me to take yoga class and sit in that soup. I will be having a memory and then notice it is not mine. it doesnt serve me to feel things for people who cant feel it themselves. sticky.

but the roses stayed over here under the "no loitering" sign. I clean frantically, avoiding calling Christina, thinking I should know what to say first but I wasnt trying very hard to get clear. I spit out my gum and called and left a message. I started frantically cleanning again and right after I moved my alter out of the corner and onto the northern wall, she called me back.

The wind whipped outside and I shredded the carpet while she sat with the silence. I fell apart only after we hung up. I called her back, no answer; she called me back. I work to help people and to give them connection, but there is a bit of me that doesnt believe that connection exists. that is too scared to fail again. that bit lets the world fly apart at the atomic level---aron just kept going off about how the universe was expanding faster than made sense with the laws---fragmentation. "so where is the landing place in this?" thats just it, there is none. but it was cognition---the thinking felt good and for once someone didnt tell me I had left my body for my mind, but that maybe now they were working together. that i could feel the fear and know reality. I know this stuff. its just about remembering.

but, what if im wrong? what if I cant handle it? what if the next place I need to go is the place I cant get back from? trust. willingness to take a risk. she told me she thought I could be very good. and that I needed to do this and I know that to be true. I yell and scream about someone until Im screaming so loud that I hear my words bounce back. "oh"..."I was talking about me". And I do think of my clients where I dont know where to go with. I feel like there is something Im not being told. like there is more information that I need. Maybe that too is me.

I started taking pictures of random things. of the roses and of jo's wolf. of any number of artfull clutters. hold still. just the beauty of any one place, any one moment. hold still. this is enough.

that and the fact that it all moves so fast. I walked my camera down the stairs, kept taking snapshots while I drove. I ran. and stacy called me--invivted me to give a short talk on---cohesion. what it is that holds one together, what it is that holds us al together. one answer is nothing---we could be dust. but cohesion feels better. maybe belief? maybe joy?

I went to the rec center and taught a large beginner class. stuff came through me alot of different stuff. I got to a place where I was talking about lungs and breath and depression and greif. I had my finger on the pulse---I could literally palpate these things and wasw given the direction of how to move them. I felt like I was being directed in surgery. also I knew that this knowledge was not from out side---it was my own experience--how do you soothe anxiety. how do you digest toxicity. If you feel it, your half way there. at least you are letting it in.

so the physical body is just cohesion. a coagulation. densified energy slowed down. The first bit of yoga is cultivating the witness. the artist steps away from the work to get perspective. and a lot of people stop here. in endless cleanes, disciplines, and restaints. but I think the real goal of yoga is to step inside. to really get inside your experience---to actually feel it. Christina asked "what does fragmentation feel like?" it feels like falling away. like a picture too big where everything is relative and therefore the is a great indifference that I take to be pointless. if feels like looking at the earth from very very far away and knowing that you are somewhere down there.

I read an article and used it in a final---it was about how experiences of connection to others litterally help us incarnate more fully. to come more totally into our body and our life as it is. our stories are sacred. the little details important. the details of this incarnation give us our purpose. we have to get into our bodies.

Im trying to be able to skinroll my lower legs.

by the end of the yoga class. we had worked it though. I me contented. "it is good".

April 18, 2007

dust

Once again, I am suffering from abandonment issues. Hurray for me, I am two years old!

Fear that I am being left or that I will be left. Im noticing that it is a fear of being abandoned by the universe in general---by my own expectations.

"There was a contract! " I scream. "yeah...Un written, Un spoken. "
but, then again, it happened before I was born, " things were supposted to happen at least within certian guidlines" you told me!
"who?"

so. I have the temper tantrum---withdraw everything I "thought" I believed, and realize---once again--that I have a line.
"no deal!"
fine.

recently: noticing people who get stuck and only can see in and people who get stuck and only can look out. Like anything. of course, the answer is in between.
I had a diagram theory once that this thing we call "Self" is not the enclosed area of the circle, but the line used to form the circle its self---only in this way can we look both out and in.
And what holds the inner world and the outter world is trust ---trust that they are held together.
An infant--moving out of its primary autism--what holds the inner world and the outter world together is:
blankey.

but anyways. Not wanting to be schizophrenic and not wanting to be a politician. I want to look in and out. that trust that binds my inside and outside together, that lets me at least try to speak out from within and be heard: same force that keeps each atom from flying away from the rest.

the fact that you survived means that you have established basic trust (or Erikson would tell us). The fact that you are sitting here means you have some degree of agreement to this reality. Enough basic trust to keep you from instantly combusting.

or, maybe somehow---the oposote and the same---I am here because my belief is too solid. that bit of me that holds on to Me. That lets me be an asshole and spew it all over the place and then try to call it self protection---which is very much what it is. Maybe I let go. And maybe i turn into dust. but for that I need trust. The same trust that will hold me together.

I want to believe that [healthy] Self structure and and selflessnesss are not mutually exclusive and likewise that letting go doesnt mean crazy. I think that kind of proves it. only through trust can you let go. Only through letting go can you ever hold it together.

BK once--in different words---explained to me that you have to be willing to die to truely be alive. it is kind of the prerequeset ground rule. This idea came up around my being too afraid to do a vipassana because I thought I might go crazy and might not be able to find my way back. He told me.
you have to want it enough that you are willing to go for it---accepting that you might go crazy and that you might never make it back. as Chris Downing said--you cannot assume rebirth to follow death. you have to truely die with no hope or else it doent count...you cant say "death--rebirth" as though they are a single word.

you have to want it baddly enough.

goddamnit.

April 11, 2007

old old old and peanut butter

deep in schoo thought I am. I blame Mr Russo: when ever I think a lot I want peanut butter. However, probably thats not true, I probaby eat too much peanut butter regardless. Mr Russo is an awsome philosophy teacher with fred flinstone fingers. He likes peanut butter and jack daniels with a nipple on it. I like philosophy becuase if you are clear thinking you can either convince someone of anything, or run them in circles endlessly. In this way, peanut butter is related to clear thinking for me, however, right now I am probably less clear than I've ever been. He used to tell the same bad jokes over and over. He was magic: he would walk down the street and then turn into a bar. He engaged me in a fifteen minute illustration about how we couldnt throw so-and-so (the girl who wasnt listening) out the window becuase of a xeno paradox. she still wasnt listening.

heres another paper. That introduction has nothing to do with it. I was just thinking about peanut butter.

My Grandpa on my mother’s side came over for Easter. He almost never participates in holidays but, then again, neither do I. I was glad to see him there. Honestly, I have been expecting him to die. However, as glad as I was that he made it, I still couldn’t quite look at him. Partly it is fear, and partly it is recognition of how foreign we are to the people who should know us best. In a certain sense, my grandpa stands as a symbol for my greatest fears and my greatest unknowns. As a society it seems that the aging represent our fears because they are losing everything that we think is essential. They remind us of the unknown as they stand closer to death—the biggest unknown of all.

My Grandpa spent probably half of his life chronically old-old. For as long as I can remember, he was stuck to the couch and never acknowledge me when I was there with my grandma everyday. He made it through my grandma’s battle and death to Alzheimer’s; a process that somehow hit him and got him off the couch. He spent several years out in the world (worrying my mother) until he recently got very sick. He did make it through, and now was hoarding jellybeans. Somebody mentioned that this was the first time they ever heard him laugh.

I tell this story to illustrate some connections I see between aging and depth. As I see it, to look at aging is to look at depth: It takes into account the whole picture, encompassing both life as it has been revealed and the forever unknown. This story reminds me that life is long and learning continues throughout. In fact, old age may force us to look at the stuff we were able to avoid so far. This story also reminds me that healing is always possible and that we can witness it if we can withdraw our projections of what it should be.

Carl G. Jung held the perspective that learning—and, therefore individuation and personality development—is a life long process. I think that he would agree with my story pointing to the idea that, right up until the end, we are still learning about our selves and others. This may seem obvious, but I think that it is an important point to make since most developmental psychology is focused on childhood. Jung asks us to extend our view of the learning child through out life. In The Development of the Individual as quoted from Anthony Storr’s compilation The Essential Jung, he held,
…we talk about the child, but we should mean the child in the adult. For in every adult there lurks a child—an eternal child, something that is always becoming, is never completed, and calls for unceasing care, attention, and education. (Storr, 1983, p. 194)

He seemed to suggest that personality development is displaced onto children because we see ourselves as lost causes. He mentioned parents who are, “always ‘doing their best’ for their children and ‘living only for them’ (Storr, 1983, p.194).
Whatever put the focus of learning on childhood, I think that it has contributed to the nature of this culture where youth is so valued. If we think that our potential is set once we leave childhood, it makes sense that we would fear old age as we believe we no longer have the power to change things for ourselves. This makes me think of my grandpa spending most of his life on the couch, how partly it was pain, but also it was depression. Adults—especially when they start living for their children—sometimes seem to stagnate and die to themselves long before they are dead. I wonder if maybe adults lose their vitality not because of age, but rather because they have been told to stop looking and they have obeyed.

However, in my story my grandpa did get off the couch; maybe he looked stuck for thirty years, but something in him was still moving. In the course of a life time, we get knocked down many times, but get up to live again in ways we never could expect. In referring to the development of the personality, Jung said, “a whole life time, in all its biological, social, and spiritual aspects is needed” (Storr, 1983, p.195). This reminds me that we must be patient with life to see what is in store. It reminds me that I need to open up my perspective to the whole arc of life, not just what it feels like right now.

This also makes me think of how wrong it is to think of anyone as a mundane, common, or un-individuated person—I think life requires everyone to be extraordinary. I was amazed by the details of the long lives described in Mary Pipher’s book, Another Country. She refers to the life-long learning as “resiliency” and said that resilient people “have learned about psychological survival from their long and complicated lives” (Pipher, p. 243). The interesting thing to me is how this “psychological survival” comes out of the challenges and deterioration. My grandpa got off the couch—not because life got easier—but because my grandma got sick and life suddenly got really hard. I might imagine that healing means that pain goes away. I might even wish than an old person lost the symptoms of their age but, usually, healing cannot be sought in this way. More than anything, I think that aging shows us our vulnerability. I have seen tremendous healing and resiliency in my family mostly in the times when things have fallen apart. I wonder if coming to terms with our flawed humanity and vulnerability might be what true healing is.

I think about healing a lot because I work with people’s bodies. I do bodywork and energy work and most of my clients are elderly. I continuously need to pull myself back from wanting to do something. Even though I am there to relieve their pain, I have to keep my projections in check: do I think there is something wrong with this person? I am trying to cure this person of their age? Working through the body, I have a perspective similar to Jung that learning is and must be a life long process. I believe that so long as someone is in a body, there is learning going on—even when it looks like they are doing nothing, even when it looks like they are messing things up. I think of one client that I work with who has been bed bound with a slow-moving form of ALS for longer than I have been alive. He cannot talk, move or feel much now but, at night, he screams out from a pain he cannot feel. I cannot begin to imagine what his experience is or what his soul is crying out for him to notice. But I can sit there with him while he is in it and I can touch him like a baby.

Mary Pipher said that, “ We younger, healthier people sometimes avoid the old to avoid our own fears of aging. If we aren’t around dying people, we don’t have to think about dying” (Pipher, p. 40). This is certainly true for me. The more I am around older people the more I think of death. However, when I said at the beginning that I still couldn’t look at my grandpa, it was not death that I thought of—it was simply the unknown. Though death stands as a symbol for the ultimate unknown, the unknown in general cannot be avoided by simply avoiding old people. Old or young, it has been a lot for me to learn to look at anyone in the eye. It feels like a lot of vulnerability and power to look at a totally unknowable other. I think that this is what therapy is once we withdraw our projections and I think that it is what depth means as well. The story of my client is an example where age epitomizes therapy and depth: can I sit with someone and both totally understand and not understand at all? Can I sit with someone and do my best while knowing there is nothing to be done?


April 09, 2007

trickster

as I wrote this yesterday I thought that another word for the trickster archetype could be " the fuck up". But today I felt that all too familair energy of "the fuck up" trying to creep back in and noticed, no. they are not the same. there is in fact a distinction between the subconscious energy bubbling up from underneith to move you forward and self sabotage. I have learned how to laugh as it falls apart. Now I want to have fun as I weave it together...not to say its not still falling apart, but a subtle shift in perspective.
(the following is a paper on The Trickster".

In The Trickster Makes This World, Lewis Hyde calls the tricksters of myth the “lords of in-between” (Hyde, pp.6). They are the boundary crossers, the boundary makers and, the boundaries themselves. The trickster archetype comes up when an old boundary no longer serves us; when we have to break the rules we have been given, or the rules we have given ourselves.

In the stories, trickster characters seem mostly unaware of the trouble their actions will create, he is an unconscious and un-socialized impulse. To acknowledge the trickster is a recognition and even respect for those times when we do the stupid things that shatter our world and force us to a new one. These are the times when it seems that our rational mind was not working but that, in retrospect, it seems clear that some part of us was. Sometimes, we want to look back on these times and chastise ourselves. But, as the trickster plays on that line between good and bad, sacred and profane and all other pairs of opposites, he reminds us that sometimes you have to be bad to be good. Sometimes you have to blaspheme against what you thought you believed to really feel the divine. Sometimes you have to appear to regress in order to move forward.

The trickster has been in play a lot for me this past year…I have done a lot of stupid things. I am a long time student of experience and, looking back, I always think that I should have been able to make it to the same place without so much drama. However, in a further retrospect, it seems that things work out pretty well. A big piece of this for me is humility. At some point last year, I started explaining myself by saying that, “you can put a monk’s robe on over many wounds”. The wounds would still be there though, so I needed to let them bleed. The idea of the trickster seems to be of playing at life as it truly is for you without judgment. Not pretending to be anywhere other than you are. It is a return to an undifferentiated state prior to any hierarchy or ideas of what life should look like. For me, it is a deeper recognition that learning is everywhere and how transcendence can be avoidance. Do not belittle any plane or way of being; nothing is empty.

Another element of the trickster stories that I really loved is the idea that what you do not have, you must steal. Lewis gave examples of Krishna as the butter thief and Prometheus stealing fire (Hyde, pp.6). This is contrary to the idea that one should just be “good” and wait for something to be handed to them. This is a more heroic risk, being willing to steal what you need, even if it means you get in trouble--you have to want it bad enough to accept the trouble. It is interesting to me how myth and life requires us to steal. In a sense, it is a recognition of how life requires sacrifice—every time one eats, breaths or steps. It demands us to get off of any high horse and deal with things as they are.

It also brings to mind a sort-of pattern of individuation where: ignorance/innocence is bliss, consciousness brings pain, then--through consciousness--comes a deeper bliss through depth. The pain of the trickster is the pain of waking up. Maybe we could stay asleep forever and not feel it, but who would want to? I am reminded of the tree of good and evil and Eve stealing the fruit of knowledge. Stupid Eve! I would argue that they were certainly going to wake up, but God was not going to hand the fruit to them. Individuation must come from a personal volition—even if it appears unconscious. We must grab for ourselves those parts of our soul that we imagine only belong to someone else. It looks like stealing but really it is already ours.

Looking at stories or looking back on pieces of my life, it is easy to see how good and bad intertwine—how bad actually comes from a deeper good. However, compassion is sometimes not that easy while in the experience and I find myself wanting to know if there is a difference between actions that are bad/good in the trickster sense and things that are just plain bad. This issue came up for me when Hyde was analyzing whether America was a nation of tricksters (Hyde, pp. 11-13). I found myself thinking that, yes, America does seem like it’s in an individuation learning curve, being the rebellious teenaged jerk…but isn’t it possible that a jerk sometimes is simply a jerk? The trickster myth would hold me back and ask for some compassion: I cannot see now what the good of this bad/good will be. The trickster myth, I think, asks us to see all bad as bad/good. However, it does temper this allowing position with warnings in the stories that the trickster should not go too far or not too many times. In the eye tossing story, coyote was told to only toss his eyes four times. He went for five and his eyes did not come back. That is to say that we don’t need to have good intentions when we are being a trickster, but we should not get caught. The purpose of the stupid times is for us to grab what we need and move forward. Otherwise, eye tossing becomes just a new way to be stuck.

I want to close this paper with a trickster story that was told to me. Hyde mentioned that, aside from entertainment, Native American trickster stories are also told as medicine. In short, it was the story of coyote traveling between the Earth plane and the underworld by climbing down and up a ladder. At some point while in the underworld, he noticed that the ladder he had been climbing was actually a very delicate spider web. Coyote was now being asked to do consciously something that had never scared him before because he hadn’t been aware of what he was doing. Coyote took the risk and returned to the Earth plane with what he had learned in the underworld. I was told that, in this version of the story, Coyote made it back safely, but that there were other stories where he had quite a bit more trouble.

I said before that I think there is bliss before awareness and also after. I also said that the things we are stealing are already ours. That story was the story of the fall out of innocence/ignorance---like Adam and Eve. It was told to me at a time that I was in the pain of waking up. I was(/am) becoming aware of the truth of things that have always been so and then needing to see the world with new awareness. Besides being the element of disruption that causes the waking up, I think that the trickster is also the compassion for the messiness that follows.